State ex rel. Beach v. Board of Loan Commissioners
New Mexico Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Santa Fe County; Edmund C. Abbott, Presiding Judge. Claim of appellee is not a valid and legal debt or liability, evidenced by bonds, coupons and other obligations. The-Enabling Act, Sec. 2; Art 21, Sec. 3 of the Constitution; 27 Ene. L., p. 6; 36 Cyc., pp. 1119, 1120; Chap. 16, L. 1912. State and County Municipal Indebtedness.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Santa Fe County; Edmund C. Abbott, Presiding Judge. Claim of appellee is not a valid and legal debt or liability, evidenced by bonds, coupons and other obligations. The-Enabling Act, Sec. 2; Art 21, Sec. 3 of the Constitution; 27 Ene. L., p. 6; 36 Cyc., pp. 1119, 1120; Chap. 16, L. 1912. State and County Municipal Indebtedness. Sec. 1, Art. 9 of the Constitution; Sec. 3, Art. 26, Constitution; Sec. 16, Art. 4, Constitution; Sec. 1, Chap. 16, L. 1912; 2 Cur. L., p. 1726, Notes 10 and 11; 205 111. 464; 46 S. E. 222; 2 Cur. L., p. 1727; 204 Pa., p. 300. Context and…
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
PARKER, J.
The plaintiff filed his claim with the Board of County Commissioners of Socorro County, for wild animal bounty, in the sum of $895.10, which was duly approved and allowed by said board and was a valid claim against said county prior to June 20, 1910. The claim was duly presented to the Board of Loan Commissioners, but said board failed and refused to take any action, either to allow' or disallow the same or to issue the bonds of the state in payment of the same. Thereupon plaintiff brought mandamus and was awarded a peremptory writ by the district court of Santa Fe County,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Grafe v. Delgado, SheriffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Bryant v. Board of Loan CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- Nelson v. NelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971