Legal Opinion

State v. Buchalski

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 8, 2014No. C112214CR; A152126PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state petitions for reconsideration of our decision in State v. Buchalski, 264 Or App 142, 331 P3d 1049 (2014). In part, we reversed based on an error in the original judgment, which the state conceded, and remanded for the trial court to merge two guilty verdicts into a single conviction for felony violation of a stalking order. While the appeal was pending, however, the trial court corrected the error in an amended judgment through an interlineation, which reads: “It further appears that Count 4 merges with Count 3 for-sentencing ***[.]” Defendant then filed an amended notice of appeal.

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BuchalskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MeekCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API