Legal Opinion

Linker v. Churnetski Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1987No. 0474PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County, denying appellant’s motion to remove a nonsuit entered at trial. We reverse and remand.

Appellant Joseph Linker initiated suit against appellee Churnetski Transportation (Churnetski) as a result of an automobile accident. In response to appellee’s expert interrogatories, appellant responded as follows: “Dr. G.W. Klem, Kingston, Pa. See report attached.” No report was attached; only bills and extracts of the office record were attached to appellant’s answers. Approximately ten months later, on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Gill v. McGraw Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Simpson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Dominick v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Smith v. GrabSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Brown v. TrinidadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Wolloch v. AikenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API