United States v. OMT Supermarket, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Presently before this Court are the United States’ Complaints to Enforce Internal Revenue Summonses in United States v. OMT Supermarket, Inc., 995 F.Supp. 526 and United States v. Middletown Supermarket, Inc., Civil Action No. 97-6536, 1997 WL 837976, — F.Supp. -, defendants OMT Supermarket, Inc.’s (“OMT”) and Middle-town Supermarket, Inc.’s (“MSI”) Answer and Motion to Dismiss Complaints to Enforce Internal Revenue Summonses, and the United States’ response thereto. For the following reasons, this Court will deny defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and enforce…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Maurice RoseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Interstate Dress Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.