Legal Opinion

People v. Everett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 7, 1973No. 56951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice English

OFFENSES CHARGED

Deceptive practice (three charges). Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, par. 17 — Id.

JUDGMENT

After dismissal of two charges of deceptive practice because of their failure to allege intent to defraud, a jury found defendant guilty of the remaining charge, judgment was entered, and he was sentenced to five months’ imprisonment.

CONTENTIONS RAISED ON APPEAL

1. Defendant was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. Defendant was denied a fair trial because of improperly admitted evidence and improper instructions.

EVIDENCE

Sylvia Reynolds, for the State:

She and her husband were the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. The PEOPLE v. NewmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. The People v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. The PEOPLE v. PalmeriAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. People v. FletcherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. People v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. State v. WilsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. People v. OgunsolaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API