Legal Opinion

Burgan v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 1, 1939No. 27263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

Each of the joint defendants in the present ease first made a statement in his own behalf, and was then sworn and testified as a witness for the other defendants. Error is assigned because the court charged the jury in thiá connection only the following : . “They have made statements to you in their own behalf, *525in doing so they were not sworn; not subject to cross-examination without their consent. If they failed to tell you the truth, they incurred no penalty by reason of such failure. You may give to their statements whatever weight you may think they ought to have; you may believe it in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  2. Staten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Cofer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Burnsed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cullens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Warren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API