Legal Opinion

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 26, 2023No. Criminal No. 2021-0598Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0598 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON ) and ) ANDREW ZABAVSKY, ) ) Defendants. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Defendants Terence Sutton and Andrew Zabavsky have filed post-trial motions for Brady sanctions, arguing that the government failed to produce prior statements by two testifying witnesses in a timely fashion and that the suppression of these statements caused them prejudice at trial. See Terence D. Sutton, Jr.’s Motion for Brady Sanctions [Dkt. No. 441]; Andrew Zabavsky’s Motion for Brady…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API