Legal Opinion

T. Reed Vreeland and Diana D. Vreeland v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 3, 1961No. 289-55PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a suit for the refund of Federal income taxes for the year 1946. The plaintiffs claim that they had a net operating loss in 1948 which they should be permitted to carry back to 1946 as a net operating loss deduction for 1946. The defendant disputes the 1948 loss.

The facts have been 'stipulated. The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, filed a joint Federal income tax return for the year 1946 reporting net income of $23,760 and a tax liability of $7,900. 1 The plaintiffs filed separate income tax returns for 1947. Mrs. Vreeland received no capital gain and sustained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Libson Shops, Inc., v. Koehler, District Director of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Lewyt Corp. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Magale v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Midland Financial Corp. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Sublett v. Westfield Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API