Legal Opinion
Collins v. Wallin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 5, 1946No. 4998PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HEALEY, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on March 19, 1946, on an order for the defendants to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue against them to restrain them from infringing the Drinker-Shaw Patent No. 1,906,453. This patent relates to a “collar” and its clamping means in any artificial respirator.
It is described in the specification as follows :
“The collar 16 is shown as made in the form of a thin flexible sheet which can be drawn taut and held in position by means of a ring 22 and four clamps 23. The clamps may be of any suitable form. As shown, they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simson Bros. v. Blancard & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Sinko Tool & Mfg. Co. v. Casco Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Leavitt v. McBee Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
- Packard Paper Box Co. v. O. B. Andrews Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1933
- Collins v. EmersonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jenn-Air Corporation v. Modern Maid CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980