Bale v. Ryder
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHIBALD, Justice.
Both parties appeal from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant’s appeal is based fundamentally upon an error committed by the Justice below when instructing the jury, objection to this instruction having been seasonably noted. We sustain the defendant’s appeal and order a new trial, thus rendering moot the issues raised by the plaintiff’s appeal.
The complaint alleged both a false arrest of, and an assault and battery on, the plaintiff, the defendant being a Portland police officer.
Admittedly, the plaintiff was arrested by the defendant without a warrant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. ChaplinskySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- City of St. Paul v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Murdock v. RipleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853
3Cited by9 opinions
- Santoni v. Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- State v. John W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Nadeau v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- National Council on Compensation Insurance v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- MacKerron v. MaduraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.