Legal Opinion
Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc. v. Tate
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 18, 1997No. Civil Action 97-935(NHP)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POLITAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on application by plaintiff, Bell Atlantic-New Jersey, Inc., for judgment awarding declaratory relief and permanent injunction of the enforcement of an order entered by the defendants, President Herbert H. Tate, Jr., and Commissioner Carmen J. Armenti of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities. AT & T Telecommunications of New Jersey, Inc., MCI Telecommunications Corporation, and the New Jersey Division of the Ratepayer Advocate were permitted to intervene in this action. Oral argument was heard in this matter on April 14, 1997.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- North Haven Board of Education v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Ameren Services Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Micronet, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Ameritech Michigan v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- Krys v. AaronDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.