Legal Opinion

Chadbourne v. Stockton Sav. & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1894No. 18,173Published

APPEAL from Superior Court, San Joaquin County; Ansel Smith, Judge. Action by Joshua Chadbourne and others against the Stockton Savings and Loan Society. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying motion for new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLE, C.

This is an appeal by defendant from the judgment and an order refusing a new trial. The case has been here before, and is reported: 88 Cal. 636, 26 Pac. 529. The action is based upon an offer on the part of the defendant to sell certain land, which offer is set out in full in the report of the last appeal. On that appeal it was held that the complaint was defective, and that a demurrer interposed to it should have been sustained, because, it is said, the offer had not been accepted within a reasonable time, nor was there any excuse shown for delay. It is then said: “As there is no…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chadbourne v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API