Legal Opinion

Kirk v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1997No. 1553-96, 1554-96PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

OVERSTREET, Judge.

The trial court accepted Appellant’s pleas of nolo contendere to two offenses of delivery of cocaine, found sufficient evidence to support the pleas, deferred a finding of guilt, and placed Appellant on ten years’ deferred adjudication probation. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. Kirk v. State, Nos. 05-92-01806-CR & 05-92-01807-CR (Tex.App.—Dallas, delivered September 5, 1996).

On appeal, Appellant raised three points of error. The Court of Appeals held it was without jurisdiction to hear the appeals because…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1998
  2. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Kirk v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Bridle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API