Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlton Darden

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 12, 2018No. 17-2435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRAS, Circuit Judge.

After serving more than two decades in prison, Carlton Darden asked the district court 1 to reduce his sentence because the Sentencing Commission had retroactively lowered the Guidelines range applicable to his offense. The court denied his motion, and we affirm.

I

In 1993, Darden was convicted of racketeering activities and conspiracy for his role in a gang. 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c), (d). Although the Guidelines establish a base offense level for racketeering-related offenses, courts must apply "the offense level applicable to the underlying racketeering activity" if it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. Charles W. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Willie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Leobardo Hernandez-MarfilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. Mark ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SanchezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  2. United States v. TenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API