United States v. Carlton Darden
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STRAS, Circuit Judge.
After serving more than two decades in prison, Carlton Darden asked the district court 1 to reduce his sentence because the Sentencing Commission had retroactively lowered the Guidelines range applicable to his offense. The court denied his motion, and we affirm.
I
In 1993, Darden was convicted of racketeering activities and conspiracy for his role in a gang. 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (c), (d). Although the Guidelines establish a base offense level for racketeering-related offenses, courts must apply "the offense level applicable to the underlying racketeering activity" if it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Charles W. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Willie JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Leobardo Hernandez-MarfilCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Mark ShoreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. SanchezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- United States v. TenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024