Legal Opinion
In re Eastman Kodak Company Securities Litigation
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 27, 2021No. 6:21-cv-06418Unknown
1Opinion
*NOT FOR PUBLICATON* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY _______________________________________ TIANDONG TANG, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-10462-FLW-ZNQ v. OPINION EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY, JAMES V. CONTINENZA, and DAVID BULLWINKLE, Defendants. WOLFSON, Chief Judge: Plaintiff Tiandong Tang sues Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”), James Continenza, and David Bullwinkle (collectively, “Defendants”), individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, for securities violations arising from a $765 million…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.