Legal Opinion

Morris v. McKay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Midland. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

In this case Morris recovered in ejectment an undivided half of the premises sued for, but the defendant McKay, who claimed to have been in possession and made improvements under a tax title, was- allowed-to recover judgment for one-half of the value of the improvements under the statute of 1875, amending Comp. L., §§ 6252, 6258.

As we have already held this statute inoperative so far as tenants in common are concerned, we need not consider the questions presented by counsel. Sands v. Davis, ante p. 17.

So much of the judgment ■ as makes allowances for improvements must be reversed, with costs,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burkle v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API