Legal Opinion

Kissel v. Seagull

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided July 21, 2021No. 3:21-cv-00120Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ADAM KISSEL, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:21-cv-00120 (JAM) MICHELLE H. SEAGULL, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION This case is about the First Amendment and a Connecticut law that regulates the activities of paid solicitors for charitable organizations. Plaintiff Adam Kissel wishes to engage in paid fundraising work for a non-profit civics education organization. But he claims that a Connecticut law…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API