Legal Opinion
Halladay v. Hall
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1910No. Civil No. 1140PublishedCited by 1 opinion
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District, in and for Yuma County. John II. Campbell, Judge.
1Per curiam
This ease must be dismissed, for the reason that the sureties upon the appeal bond have not justified in accordance with the requirements of paragraph 1516 of the Revised Statutes of 1901, or at all. This statute is mandatory. This court has, therefore, acquired no jurisdiction. McDonald v. Ellis, 4 Ariz. 189, 36 Pac. 37.
The appeal is dismissed.
CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McDonald v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by1 opinion
- McBroom v. YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1913