Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bird v. Hart

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1965No. Nos. 38690 and 38691Published

1DissentZimmerman, J.

My view is that the majority holdings in the instant cases and in the case of Spalding v. Waxler, 2 Ohio St. 2d 1, establish too drastic a rule against the driver of a motor vehicle who is unfortunate enough to collide with another vehicle due to a sudden failure of brakes or other equipment of which he had no prior warning and which he had no reason to foresee. He is now made virtually an insurer and cannot rely on the affirmative defense of unavoidable accident except in a very limited number of instances.

To my way of thinking, whether a particular occurrence involving a sudden, unexpected…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Kormos v. Cleveland Retail Credit Men's Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Satterthwaite v. MorganOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Spalding v. WaxlerOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Millhorn v. Donaldson Baking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API