Legal Opinion

Continental Oil Co. v. Jones

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1939No. 6287PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHT, District Judge.

The plaintiff has instituted this action against the defendant as Collector of Internal Revenue, and in the petition alleges that on the 21st day of June; 1932, there became effective the Revenue Act of 1932 which provided for the imposition of a tax of one cent per gallon on gasoline and four cents per gallon on lubricating oils manufactured, produced or imported into the United States, and that said tax would be imposed upon all gasoline and lubricating oils owned by manufacturers, producers or importers on said date of June 21, 1932; that said Act was amended by the *695A…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. E. Albrecht & Son, Inc. v. LandyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  4. Mehrlust v. HigginsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API