Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sal-Mar Amusements, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 1, 1993No. 00338PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This appeal challenges the trial court’s finding that appellant/bar constituted a common nuisance. We affirm.

Vanity, a bar in the city of Harrisburg, is owned by appellant Sal-Mar Amusements, Inc.; Gary Miller is sole shareholder and president of the corporation. Beginning in the fall of 1989, Harrisburg police received numerous complaints from residents in the area surrounding Vanity about heavy traffic, boisterous conduct, drinking, littering and drug use. Police responded by conducting physical and video surveillance of the premises and, eventually, using an undercover agent to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. In Re GrossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re D.A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Jefferson Bank v. Newton AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Chalkey v. RoushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. DutrievilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. City of Rochester v. Premises Located at 10-12 South Washington StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API