Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Schneider

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1890No. 6649PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Hamilton. Tried below before Hon. T. L. Nugent.

1Opinion of the Court

HEHRY, Associate Justice.

—This suit was brought by defendant in error to recover the amount of two promissory notes and to foreclose .a vendor’s lien. The defendant answered, but subsequently withdrew his pleadings,- whereupon judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for the amount of the notes and foreclosing the lien.

The record contains no statement of facts. It is complained that the court erred in rendering judgment in favor of plaintiff below as upon a liquidated and proven instrument when no such instrument was filed with the papers of the case or produced in evidence. There being no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bond v. MallowTexas Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mays v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Chapman v. WittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Dickerson v. San Antonio, U. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. WolfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. Chapman v. WittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API