Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Sonoco Products Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1996No. 95-CA-58PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fain, Judge.

Respondent-appellant Sonoco Products Company appeals from an order of the trial court denying its motion for default judgment, or, in the alternative, for the vacation of petitioner-appellee Johnnie Anderson’s notice of voluntary dismissal, pursuant to Civ.R. 41(A). Sonoco had appealed to the trial court from a decision by the Industrial Commission that Anderson was entitled to participate in the Ohio Workers’ Compensation Fund. Sonoco contends that the trial court erred by finding that Civ.R. 41(A) has application to a claimant-appellee who seeks to dismiss the action prior to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polikoff v. AdamOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Rhynehardt v. Sears Logistics ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Keller v. LTV Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Robinson v. B.O.C. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Liebe v. Admin., Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Robinson v. B.O.C. Group Gen. Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Keller v. ManvilleOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Schade v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API