Legal Opinion

Carroll v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1982No. 81-1240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERSEY, Judge.

The trial court sustained a state objection and excluded defense photographic exhibits without conducting a Richardson hearing. (Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971)). Since “[a] Richardson inquiry is designed to ferret out procedural prejudice occasioned by a party’s discovery violation,” Smith v. State, 872 So.2d 86, 88 (Fla.1979), it is a mandatory component of the trial court’s decision-making process. Failure to conduct a Richardson inquiry requires automatic reversal. Smith v. State, supra; Kilpatrick v. State, 376 So.2d 386 (Fla.1979); Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Cumbie v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Cuciak v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  5. Wilcox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Brumley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API