Legal Opinion

Miller v. Yates

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1933No. 5480PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

*438In determining this writ of error, it will suffice to use the statement of the nature and result and the statement of the facts of this case from the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which are adopted by plaintiff in error, in language as follows:

“This is an action in trespass to try title and for damages brought by appellant, Mrs. Addie Miller, surviving wife and devisee of M. C. Miller, who died in 1915, against I. G. Yates and others holding oil and gas leases under Yates.
“Upon peremptory charge there was a verdict and judgment for defendants.
“The land sued for is in two tracts, each…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Booth v. UpshurTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Forbes v. WithersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Austin v. DunganTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Miller v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Weatherly v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Turner v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Kirby Lumber Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API