Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Legislature of the State of Mississippi v. Adrian Shipman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2015No. 2015-CA-00605-SCTPublished

1ConcurrenceRandolph, Presiding Justice

¶ 44. I concur with the result reached by five other justices to reverse and render, relying heavily upon Justice Chandler’s political-question analysis — especial*1225ly excluding judicial review of “policy choices and value determinations constitutionally committed for resolution to the halls of [the Legislature].” Ghane v. Mid-S. Inst. of Self Def. Shooting, Inc., 137 So.3d 212, 217 (Miss.2014). The substance of the issue before us today, to whom and how much money should be spent to provide services to the public, is a policy choice and value determination committed for resolution to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Alexander v. State by and Through AllainMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Orick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Chris McDaniel v. Thad CochranMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API