Legal Opinion

In Re Easysaver Rewards Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided June 4, 2010No. MDL No. 2165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING TRANSFER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the entire Panel: Defendant Provide Commerce, Inc., has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings of this litigation in the Southern District of California. Plaintiffs in the consolidated Southern District of California action support the motion. Defendant Regent Group, Inc., supports the motion or, alternatively, suggests centralization in the Southern District of Texas. Plaintiff in the District of New Jersey action opposes centralization.

This litigation currently consists of three…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Eli Lilly & Co.(cephalexin Monohydrate)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Webloyalty. Com, Inc., Marketing & Sales PracticesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011
  2. In re Trilegiant Membership Program Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API