Pendergast v. Town of Colebrook
Connecticut Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcEVOY, J.
This action is brought by the plaintiff to recover damages because, in the year 193?, the defendant caused certain changes and repairs to be made in the Mill-brook Road, which involved the regrading and altering of the surface of the road and the installation of new masonry and concrete culverts diagonally across the road, the result of which is claimed to have been that a greatly increased collection and accumulation of water was cast upon the premises owned by the plaintiff and occupied by her brother.
The defendant, generally, denies that any damage was caused and justifies its action under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Judd v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Salzman v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Rudnyai v. Town of HarwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Pleasure Beach Park Co. v. Bridgeport Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Borough of Torrington v. MessengerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corentin v. Town of ColumbiaConnecticut Superior Court · 1972
- Datronic Rental v. Dl Autobody Tow., No. Cv93 053 06 67 (Jul. 27, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994