Legal Opinion
In re GT Advanced Technologies, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 1, 2016No. Case No. 14-11916-HJBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
Henry J. Boroff, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court is the “Debtors’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Administrative Expense Claim of Tera Xtal Technology Corp.” (the “Summary Judgment Motion”), filed by the debtors-in-possession in these jointly administered Chapter 11 proceedings. Tera Xtal Technology Corp. (“TXT”)2 seeks administrative expense priority for a claim in excess of $3.6 million in the debtors’ cases based on alleged lost profits caused by one of the affiliated debtors, GT Advanced Technologies Limited (“GTAT Ltd.”).3 For the reasons discussed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re Mammoth Mart, Inc., Debtor. Stanley Cramer v. Mammoth Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Reading Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re CorbettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Krisu Hospitality, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
- Robert Pidcock, as Personal Representative of the v. McCuneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Scubla v. Town of East Hampton New YorkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020