Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Ikehara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment *912Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 8, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant contended that he was forced to take a leave of absence due to work-related stress caused in part by his poor working relationship with a temporary co-worker. He admitted, however, that he failed to give advance notice of the leave and that he did not refer to his union contract concerning the procedure for requesting such a leave. Claimant also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HoganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. In re the Claim of ColavitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re the Claim of CouloteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. In re the Claim of HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SolanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of FerrugiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. In re the Claim of NataleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. In re the Claim of RedloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API