Legal Opinion

State v. Richards

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 23, 2016No. 120833582; A155895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEMUNIZ, S. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment that revoked his probation and imposed revocation sanctions of 17 months in prison and a three-year post-prison supervision term. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court lacked authority to revoke his probation, because he had already completed a structured, intermediate post-prison supervision sanction for the same conduct relied on by the court in revoking his probation. For the reasons explained below, we affirm.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. In November 2012, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of first-degree burglary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lane County v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Taylor v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RichardsOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API