Legal Opinion

Advance International, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided September 6, 1988No. Docket Nos. 7749-87, 7750-87PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Held, amounts transferred by DISC to its parent treated as actual distributions.

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge:

Respondent issued statutory notices of deficiencies to petitioners1 Advance Machine Co. (Machine) and Advance International, Inc. (International), on December 29, 1986. In the statutory notices respondent determined that International did not qualify as a domestic international sales corporation (DISC) during its fiscal years 1980, 1981, and 1982. Respondent determined the following deficiencies (which result from taxing International’s DISC income to both entities in the alternative):

Machine

[[Image here]]

International

[[Image here]]

The parties have since stipulated that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cwt Farms, Inc. And Cwt International, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Haber v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  3. Jack Haber and Doris Haber v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. CWT Farms, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Pierce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCoy Enterprises, Inc., & Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. General Elec. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. McCoy Enters. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Advance International, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API