Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 2003No. A03A0943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury trial, Larry Arnold appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

Decided March 13, 2003. Carl P. Greenberg, for appellant.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determines…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Phagan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Herring v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Truitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. Riddle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API