Legal Opinion

Shinder v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1984No. Claim No. 61498-APublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be reversed, with costs, and the claim dismissed.

The claim essentially seeks judicial review of the allocation of police resources. The absence of a “special duty” owed to claimant by the State precludes his recovery (see Napolitano v County of Suffolk, 61 NY2d 863; Evers v Westerberg, 32 NY2d 684). Nor was such a “special duty” created by the officers’ assumption of a duty when they earlier attempted to remove the bull from the roadway, as there is no basis for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Evers v. WesterbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Napolitano v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cuffy v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Pelaez v. SeideNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Helman v. County of WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Ferreira v. City of BinghamtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
  5. State of NY v. City of Johnstown, NYDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API