Legal Opinion

Tepfer v. Ideal Gas and Electrical Fixtures Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1908Published

Action to recover dividends declared on corporate stock.

1Opinion of the CourtFinelite, J.

Defendant demurs to the complaint and the two causes of action therein stated on the ground that the same does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is brought to recover unpaid dividends. By defendant demurring to plaintiff’s complaint the defendant concedes that the plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable construction of his pleading (Springfield Fire & M. Ins. v. Village of Keeseville, 80 Hun, 162; Foley v. Mail & Express, 8 Misc. Rep. 91), and admits all the facts stated as well as such as may be implied by fair, reasonable intendment. Sage v. Culver,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Hopper v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Village of KeesevilleNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Foley v. Mail & Express Publishing Co.The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API