Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. Weston, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2001No. 77637PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Michael J. Corrigan, Judge.

R.C. 4735.21 states that no person seeking to collect compensation in connection with a real estate transaction shall have a right of action unless that person alleges and proves that the person was licensed as a real estate broker. Plaintiff Arnold H. Ritchie, a real estate salesperson (but not a licensed broker), brought this action against defendant Weston, Inc., asserting a breach-of-contract claim over a disputed commission that had been assigned to him by Grubb & Ellis, a licensed real estate broker. The court, sitting without a jury, denied Weston’s motions…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union 377 v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Inter Insurance Exchange of the Chicago Motor Club v. WagstaffOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. WemerOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. S. D. Stanson, Inc. v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Ramco Specialties, Inc. v. PansegrauOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schaffter v. Creative Capital Leasing Group, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Apple v. Water World, Inc., Unpublished Decision (11-21-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API