Legal Opinion

Watson v. State Compensation Commissioner

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1932No. 7262PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Jud&e :'

Bazz Watson, upon the compensation commissioner’s refusal to entertain a claim, which arose in 1921, on the ground of an alleged non-compliance with the statute requiring such claims to be filed within six months after injury, resorts to mandamus. He seeks to invoke this extraordinary writ on the assumption that he had substantially complied with the statute, citing Culurides v. Ott, 78 W. Va. 696, 90 S. E. 270.

This Court, in the case of Poccardi v. Ott, 83 W. Va. 166, 98 S. E. 69, 70, held that to entitle an applicant to partici pate in tbe workmen’s compensation fund be must…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Smith v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Culurides v. OttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Poccardi v. OttWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State ex rel. Ferrel v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State v. Comp. Com.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Koebert v. City of ClarksburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API