Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Hehn

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided March 19, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John D. Bennett, S.

In this uncontested prohate proceeding, the propounded instrument bears the date of January 5, 1924. One witness is dead; the other, whose present address is unknown, “ possibly now resides in Ireland ”.

The quantum of proof ordinarily required seems to be modified (according to the authorities) where the will proffered is more than 30 years old. Such a document is denominated an ‘ ‘ ancient will ’ ’ and is treated in the same manner as other “ ancient documents ” (see Matter of Barney, 185 App. Div. 782, 798, 799; 2 Jessup Redfield on Surrogates Law and Practice [rev. ed.,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Bowman v. ChristmanNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Jackson ex dem. Hunt v. LuquereNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Jackson ex dem. Burhans v. BlanshanNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  4. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of BarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Rider v. LeggNew York Supreme Court · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BrittainNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of SamelsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of WhyattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API