Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Beal (In Re Beal)

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided July 28, 2006No. 05-03452-SVK, 05-C-1111PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(a)(3), Mary Grossman, Chapter 13 Trustee (“Trustee”), seeks leave to appeal the interlocutory order of the bankruptcy court denying her motion to dismiss the bankruptcy petition of Willie G. and Jeanette Beal (“the Beals”). The Trustee moved to dismiss based on 11 U.S.C. § 109(g)(2), which prohibits a debtor who voluntarily dismisses a petition after a creditor has filed a request for relief from the automatic stay from refiling within 180 days.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In May 2003, the Beals petitioned for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re CovelliUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  2. In re GibasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  3. In Re DurhamUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  4. In re PaytonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  5. Bruce A. Ruth & Dawn Conversions, Inc. v. Swigert (In re Swigert)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API