Delmas v. Martin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Third District, Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.
The action is to recover a lot in the City of San Jose, and the plaintiff deraigns title through a grant made in 1847, by the Alcalde, to one Yillagrana, a deed from the latter to Peter Davidson, made in June, 1847, and a conveyance from Davidson to the plaintiff, made in April, 1867. The defendants claim that the alleged grant to Yillagrana, is void for uncertainty; and deraign their title to the premises.under conveyances from the City of San Jose, as successors in interest to the former pueblo of that name. On the trial, the Court held the,grant to Yillagrana to be valid and sufficiently…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schellhous v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Rodriguez v. ComstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Whitfield v. DebrincatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Ferrer v. Home Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Santillan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.