Legal Opinion

Martin Rodriguez Sanchez v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1978No. 78-2604PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from denial of relief under § 2255. The appellant testified under oath that there was no plea bargain. Without supporting evidence of any kind he now asserts there was. This is not sufficient. Matthews v. U. S., 533 F.2d 900 (CA5, 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1121, 97 S.Ct. 1156, 51 L.Ed.2d 571; Dugan v. U. S., 521 F.2d 231 (CA5, 1975).

The court was not required to enter findings that defendant would not benefit from the YCA. Brown v. U. S., 551 F.2d 619 (CA5, 1977); Mitchell v. U. S., 547 F.2d 875 (CA5,1977); U. S. v. Gamboa-Cano, 510 F.2d 598 (CA5, 1975). We cannot say…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dan Dugan v. United States of America, Henry Rowland Ray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Victor Sandoval CavazosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. C. Carey Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Larry Joseph Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. Sherod William Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Little v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API