Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Marberry

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1951No. 5298PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Chief Justice.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in holding that the members of the civil service board of the city of Phoenix, respondents-appellants, acted without or in excess of their jurisdiction in sustaining the dismissal from service of Hobert Marberry, petitioner-appellee, a bus operator in the department of transportation of the city of Phoenix.

The Phoenix city manager by an order in writing dismissed petitioner, a civil service employee, from his job for the reason that Marberry had allegedly five times violated a lawful and official…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Phoenix v. SittenfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern California Gas Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Harmon v. Hanson's Pump & MacHine Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Commerce Mortgage Co. v. Title Realty Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Linsenmeyer v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Robertson v. McNeillArizona Supreme Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API