Legal Opinion

Monarch Coal & Mining Co. v. Hand

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Fulton county; the Hon. John A. Gray, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

The appellee, Jane Hand, filed her bill in the Fulton circuit court to foreclose a mortgage on 116 acres of land in that county. After the mortgage had been given, the mortgagor, Jonathan A. Emans, sold and conveyed to the appellant company, in fee simple, about three acres of land, together with all the coal, and the right to mine and remove the same, commencing with and lying below the vein of coal known locally as the third vein, under all the rest of said 116 acres of land. The deed contained covenants of general warranty, but was made “subject to a mortgage to Jane Hand in the principal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. WessonIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Briscoe v. PowerIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Moore v. ShurtleffIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cincinnati, Richmond & Fort Wayne Railroad v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Anicker v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Henry v. . HeggieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Metzger v. EmmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Adrian State Bank v. MulroySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API