New York v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentTimbers, Circuit Judge
More than two years ago, this Court remanded this case to the ICC “for the limited purpose of determining whether the proposed rates discriminate against the lake carriers as connecting lines.” State of New York v. United States, 568 F.2d 887, 897 (2 Cir. 1977).1 Our remand was a narrow one which called for a specific determination on a precise issue. As the author of our earlier opinion remanding the case to the ICC, it is crystal clear to me that the Commission on remand either has misconstrued our mandate or has ignored it. 356 I.C.C. 82 (1978). I therefore dissent from today’s majority…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. MechlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Western Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rush v. GardnerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
- Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
- State of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.