Legal Opinion
Shockome v. Shockome
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*529In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.), dated May 10, 2004, which, inter alia, modified a stipulation of settlement entered into by the parties on July 11, 2002, by awarding the father sole custody of the subject children and granting her supervised visitation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
In adjudicating custody disputes, the paramount concern is the best interest of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Fanelli v. FanelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re Rebecca B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fallon v. FallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Walden v. WaldenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- O'Loughlin v. SweetlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- O'Loughlin v. SweetlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012