Legal Opinion

Lemond v. Astrike

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1933No. 14,642PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKime, C. J.

— Appellant was the payee and holder of a promissory note of $325.00 face value, who brought suit in a complaint of one paragraph against the maker, Astrike, and the two sureties. Appellees answered by general denial, a plea of payment and pleaded the transaction alleging payment to an alleged agent of the holder. There was then filed a cross-complaint alleging payment and asking for cancellation of the note. General denials were filed to all pleadings .and also a reply to appellees’ third paragraph of answer, thus closing the issues. Trial by court followed with a finding against appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnett v. GlutingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Rexroth v. HollowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Wagner v. McCoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. VossIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Rothchild v. Citizens Loan Co. of Indianapolis, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API