Legal Opinion

McKenica v. City of Tonawanda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 30, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when a police vehicle struck him as he crossed Niagara Street in the City of Tonawanda. At the time of the accident, defendant police officer was responding to a call for assistance from another *952officer. Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on. the ground that, pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104, civil liability may not be imposed upon them.

Supreme Court properly denied that motion. Defendants failed to establish their entitlement to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rouse v. DahlemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Schaeffer v. DiDomenicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spalla v. Village of BrockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Lopez v. Town of GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Sisson v. BaritotAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API