Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. Fayne

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The facts are not in dispute. Appellant Coggs is an attorney, and was retained to represent the defendant in a paternity proceeding before the county court. The county court called the case for trial on April 23, 1963, and neither the defendant nor Mr. Coggs was present. No explanation of their absence was given at the time. The trial began, and the testimony of the complaining witness was being taken when the defendant Fayne entered the courtroom alone. The complaining witness’ testimony was read to the defendant, and he was then examined. At 9:40 a. m., after the testimony was closed,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Farrell v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JakubowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. RybackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Milwaukee County v. CaldwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State Ex Rel. Di Salvo v. County Court of Washington CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API