Legal Opinion
Schneelock v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 22, 1995No. 95-2707PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
665 So.2d 1063 (1995)
Arturo SCHNEELOCK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 95-2707.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 13, 1995.
On Motion for Rehearing November 22, 1995.
Arturo Schneelock, Avon Park, pro se, appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
AFFIRMED.
DELL, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
STEVENSON, Judge.
The motion for rehearing is denied in part and granted in part. We grant rehearing only to correct the opinion to reflect that appellant was pro se and not represented by counsel. We deny rehearing on the merits.
We also…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
4Cited by10 opinions
- Padgett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Gutierrez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Hylleberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Rowe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.