Legal Opinion

People v. Nikonowicz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 4, 1984No. 5-83-0589PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

At issue in this appeal is whether the trial court should have allowed the defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea where no verbatim transcript was kept of the plea proceeding and the defendant alleged an invalid waiver of counsel under Supreme Court Rule 401 (87 Ill. 2d R. 401).

On July 15, 1983, the defendant, Michael Nikonowicz, came before Judge Thomas Hildebrand on his first appearance. At that time the court accepted a guilty plea from the defendant to the charge of possessing less than 30 grams of cannabis (see Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. SGVz, par. 704(c)). No verbatim transcript…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. HoppingIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re AbdullahIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. McCartyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. People v. LyonsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. People v. MontgomeryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  3. People v. ParteeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. CooperAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. HarpoleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API